Aspiring medical students need to understand Gillick competence and the Fraser guidelines. This is because it's tested regularly during interviews, but it also demonstrates their understanding of critical ethical and legal issues in patient care, particularly with minors.
Discussing these concepts shows they are aware of and understand consent, autonomy, and confidentiality in healthcare, which are vital for building patient trust. It also shows a commitment to the future practice of medicine ethically and responsibly—highly valued qualities in medical candidates.
Where do the Gillick Competence and Fraser Guidelines originate from?
The Gillick competence and Fraser guidelines originate from a significant legal case in the UK, Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986).
The case was initiated by Victoria Gillick, a mother who argued that children under 16 should not receive contraceptive advice or treatment without parental consent.
When the case reached the House of Lords, the court ultimately ruled against her, establishing two important legal principles.
These principles—Gillick competence and the Fraser guidelines—are now central to healthcare decisions involving minors in the UK.
What is Gillick Competence?
Gillick competence is a legal concept that applies to children under 16 who seek medical treatment.
If a healthcare professional determines that a minor has the maturity and understanding to comprehend the treatment and its implications, the minor is deemed "Gillick competent."
This means they can give informed consent to medical decisions without parental involvement. It is key to note that Gillick competence is specific to each medical decision and depends on the complexity and potential risks of the treatment – it is not a fixed set of guidelines.
Key conditions whilst assessing Gillick Competence:
There is no standardised test for assessing Gillick competence. Healthcare professionals must evaluate various factors, including:
Experience with healthcare: Previous medical encounters may aid the child in understanding procedures or treatments.
Maturity and intelligence: The healthcare professional gauges the child’s understanding through a conversation, assessing their ability to weigh the pros and cons of the proposed treatment.
Understanding risks and outcomes: The child’s grasp of the treatment's potential effects on their life is essential for informed decision-making.
This assessment is repeated for each decision, ensuring that competence is judged case-by-case rather than assumed.
What are the Fraser Guidelines?
The Fraser guidelines, named after one of the judges in the Gillick case, guide when healthcare professionals can offer contraceptive and sexual health advice to minors under 16 without parental consent.
These guidelines apply specifically to cases involving contraception and sexual health.
According to the guidelines, the healthcare professional must be satisfied that:
The minor understands the treatment.
The minor cannot be convinced to involve their parents.
The minor is likely to continue engaging in sexual activity without contraception.
Without the treatment, the minor’s health may suffer.
The treatment is in the minor’s best interest.
If these criteria are met, the healthcare professional can respect the minor's confidentiality regarding sexual health and contraceptive matters.
Safeguarding and Consent Policies by Age:
Consent policies in the UK vary depending on age, especially concerning safeguarding:
Under 13:
The law is stricter for children under 13. Sexual activity involving minors under 13 is illegal, and any related disclosures will prompt safeguarding actions.
Although Gillick competence can technically be applied, most treatments at this age require parental involvement for the child's safety.
Under 16:
The Gillick and Fraser principles become relevant. Healthcare professionals must evaluate each case individually, ensuring children are adequately protected while honouring their ability to make informed decisions when appropriate.
In both cases, safeguarding remains a priority, and healthcare professionals must balance respecting autonomy with protecting the child from harm.
What are the key Differences Between Gillick Competence and Fraser Guidelines?
While both Gillick competence and the Fraser guidelines address consent and capacity, their application differs:
Gillick Competence: This applies broadly to any medical treatment or procedure, assessing whether a child can consent independently based on their maturity and understanding.
Fraser Guidelines: Focus specifically on issues of sexual health and contraception for minors under 16, with set criteria that must be met for consent without parental knowledge.
Medical Ethics: Gillick Competence and Fraser Guidelines
Autonomy
These guidelines respect the autonomy of the child.
At the same time, they carefully evaluate autonomy to prevent harm.
Beneficence and Non-Maleficence
It is key to ensure that no harm comes to the child whilst acting in their best interests.
Assessing competence allows professionals to make decisions that are beneficial while avoiding risks.
Justice
Fairness is essential when evaluating a child's capacity for consent.
Gillick competence and Fraser guidelines emphasise that competence is determined on a case-by-case basis, regardless of age alone.
Here are some medicine interview questions about both guidelines:
What is Gillick competence, and why is it significant in medical practice, particularly when working with minors?
What are the Fraser guidelines, and how do they differ from Gillick competence in terms of application and purpose?
When assessing a child’s competence, what specific factors should healthcare professionals consider to ensure informed decision-making?
What role does the concept of autonomy play in the Gillick competence framework, and why is it vital for healthcare providers to understand?
Comments